As any computer programmer could tell you, a computer is only as reliable as the software that it's running. That's why Congress is going to be in for a suprise in 2004 if they don't listen to Russ Holt (D-NJ) and take a closer look at electronic voting. It's not all it's cracked up to be. Here's a summary of his bill, H.R. 2239, which I support:
Voter Confidence and Increased Accessibility Act of 2003 - Amends the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to provide for an extension of time for States to request payments for activities to improve administration of elections and for replacement of punch card or lever voting machines.Repeals the exemption of the Election Assistance Commission from certain Government contracting requirements (thus requiring the Commission to advertise for proposals for purchases and contracts for supplies or services).
Revises audit capacity requirements to require the voting system to produce a voter-verified paper record suitable for a manual audit equivalent or superior to that of a paper ballot box system.
Requires the voting system to provide a mechanism for voter-verification of results with respect to individuals with disabilities which separates the function of vote generation from the function of vote casting, but does not require the use of paper. Requires instruction of election officials in the rights of the disabled to vote with the assistance of an aide of their selection under the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Requires the Commission to study and develop best practices to enhance accessibility and voter-verification mechanisms for disabled voters.
Accelerates the deadline for compliance with voting systems standards from January 1, 2006, to the regularly scheduled November 2004 general Federal election.
Requires each State and jurisdiction unable to meet such deadline to receive a paper voting system at Commission expense that shall be deemed compliant with such standards for use in the November 2004 general election.
Requires Federal certification of technological security of voter registration lists.
Directs the Commission to: (1) conduct manual mandatory surprise recounts of the voter-verified records of each election for Federal office (and, at State or local option, of elections for State and local office) in .5 percent of the jurisdictions in each State and .5 percent of the overseas jurisdictions in which voter-verified records are preserved in accordance with this Act immediately following each general election for Federal office; and (2) promptly publish the results of those recounts.
Notice the point about advertising for services. That means ChoicePoint could not just be named by Republican state houses without even taking bids. Unfortunately, the bill is stuck in the 6-3 Republican House Administration Committee:
Republican Members
Rep. Robert W. Ney, (R-OH) Chairman
Rep. Vernon J. Ehlers, (R-MI)
Rep. John L. Mica (R-FL)
Rep. John Linder (R-GA)
Rep. John T. Doolittle (R-CA)
Rep. Thomas M. Reynolds (R-NY)Democratic Members
Rep. John B. Larson (D-CT) Ranking Member
Rep. Juanita Millender-McDonald (D-CA)
Rep. Robert Brady (D-PA)
On the otherhand, the Chairman from Ohio was instrumental in getting the 2002 law passed, which at least tried to fix the system. I hope that he sees the flaw.
If we can get enough support for this bill, and get a prominent Senator to sponsor a similar bill, the story might start getting coverage in the press. ChoicePoint and electronic voting systems with no paper trail will eliminate the scandal all right in 2004. There will be no possible way to determine if the election was accurate or not! ChoicePoint's method of disenfranchising voters is proprietary, or secret, and guess what! The electronic voting software is, too! How can you contest a computer chip without a paper trail to verify the results?
Don't take it from me, listen to the folks at Stanford University:
Rep. Rush Holt of New Jersey has introduced a bill requiring a voter-verifiable paper trail.The Voter Confidence and Increased Accessibility Act of 2003.
"We cannot afford nor can we permit another major assault on the integrity of the American electoral process," said Rep. Rush Holt. "Imagine it's Election Day 2004. You enter your local polling place and go to cast your vote on a brand new 'touch screen' voting machine. The screen says your vote has been counted. As you exit the voting booth, however, you begin to wonder. How do I know if the machine actually recorded my vote? The fact is, you don't."
Folks, this is what we've been waiting for! Please contact your U.S. Representative ASAP and ask them to co-sponsor bill (and, of course, support it). Let everyone know about this pending legislation.
H.R. 2239 needs to be signed into law A.S.A.P. Keep reading for more details.
For the record, here's the full text of the bill from the Library of Congress:
A BILLTo amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to require a voter-verified permanent record or hardcopy under title III of such Act, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Voter Confidence and Increased Accessibility Act of 2003'.
SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF TIME PROVIDED FOR STATES TO REQUEST PAYMENTS UNDER TITLE I.
(a) PAYMENTS FOR ACTIVITIES TO IMPROVE ADMINISTRATION OF ELECTIONS- Section 101(a) of the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (42 U.S.C. 15301(a)) is amended by striking `not later than 6 months after the date of the enactment of this Act' and inserting `not later than the Tuesday next after the first Monday in November 2003'.
(b) PAYMENTS FOR REPLACEMENT OF PUNCH CARD OR LEVER VOTING MACHINES- Section 102(b)(1) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 15301(b)(1)) is amended by striking `not later than the date that is 6 months after the date of the enactment of this Act' and inserting `not later than the Tuesday next after the first Monday in November 2003'.
(c) EXTENSION OF PERIOD OF AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS-
(1) IN GENERAL- Section 104(a) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 15304(a)) is amended by striking `$650,000,000' and inserting `an aggregate amount of $650,000,000 for fiscal years 2003 and 2004'.
(2) DATE FOR TRANSFER TO ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION OF UNOBLIGATED FUNDS- Section 104(c)(2)(B) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 15304(c)(2)(B)) is amended by striking `September 1, 2003' and inserting `January 1, 2004'.
(d) REQUIREMENT TO DEPLOY INTERIM MEASURE IF WAIVER REQUESTED- Section 102(a)(3)(B) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 15301(a)(3)(B)) is amended by striking the period at the end and inserting the following: `, except that any State requesting any such waiver shall accept and implement a paper system for use on an interim basis as provided in section 5(b) of the Voter Confidence and Increased Accessibility Act of 2003 in time for use in the November 2004 general election.'.
SEC. 3. REPEAL OF EXEMPTION OF ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION FROM CERTAIN GOVERNMENT CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS.
(a) IN GENERAL- Section 205 of the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (42 U.S.C. 15325) is amended by striking subsection (e).
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE- The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply with respect to contracts entered into by the Election Assistance Commission on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
SEC. 4. PROMOTING ACCURACY, INTEGRITY, AND SECURITY THROUGH VOTER-VERIFIED PERMANENT RECORD OR HARD COPY.
(a) IN GENERAL- Section 301(a)(2) of the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (42 U.S.C. 15481(a)(2)) is amended to read as follows:
`(2) VOTER-VERIFICATION AND AUDIT CAPACITY-
`(A) VOTER-VERIFICATION IN GENERAL- The voting system shall produce a voter-verified paper record suitable for a manual audit equivalent or superior to that of a paper ballot box system, as further specified in subparagraph (B).
`(B) MANUAL AUDIT CAPACITY-
`(i) The voting system shall produce a permanent paper record, each individual paper record of which shall be made available for inspection and verification by the voter at the time the vote is cast, and preserved within the polling place in the manner in which all other paper ballots are preserved within the polling place on Election Day for later use in any manual audit.
`(ii) The voting system shall provide the voter with an opportunity to correct any error made by the system before the permanent record is preserved for use in any manual audit.
`(iii) The voter verified paper record produced under subparagraph (A) and this subparagraph shall be available as an official record and shall be the official record used for any recount conducted with respect to any election in which the system is used.
`(C) SOFTWARE AND MODEMS-
`(i) No voting system shall at any time contain or use undisclosed software. Any voting system containing or using software shall disclose the source code of that software to the Commission, and the Commission shall make that source code available for inspection upon request to any citizen.
`(ii) No voting system shall contain any wireless communication device at all.
`(iii) All software and hardware used in any electronic voting system shall be certified by laboratories accredited by the
Commission as meeting the requirements of clauses (i) and (ii).'.
(b) VOTER VERIFICATION OF RESULTS FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES- Section 301(a)(3) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 15481(a)(3) is amended--(1) in the heading, by inserting `AND VOTER-VERIFICATION OF RESULTS' after `ACCESSIBILITY';
(2) in subparagraph (B), by striking `; and' and inserting the following: `, and such voting system shall provide a mechanism for voter-verification of results which separates the function of vote generation from the function of vote casting in a manner analogous to that described in section 4 with respect to the separation of paper ballot generation and paper ballot verification and preservation, but does not require the use of paper.';
(3) by amending subparagraph (C) to read as follows:
`(C) The equipment deployed in accordance with subparagraph (B) shall meet the voting system standards for disability access and voter-verification of results as outlined in this paragraph in accordance with the deadline set forth in section 5(a), provided that if it does not and an interim paper system is deployed in accordance with section 5(b), disabled voters shall have the option of using the interim paper system with the assistance of an aide of the voter's personal selection or using the voting system otherwise put in place for use by disabled voters at the time in question in accordance with the Help America Vote Act of 2002, as in effect prior to the enactment of this Act, except that the deadline set forth in section 301(a)(3)(C) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 15481(a)(3)(C)) is moved forward from January 1, 2007, to January 1, 2006.'; and
(4) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
`(D) Election officials shall be instructed in the rights of the disabled to vote with the assistance of an aide of their selection under the Voting Rights Act of 1965.'.
(c) SPECIFIC, DELINEATED REQUIREMENT OF STUDY, TESTING, AND DEVELOPMENT OF BEST PRACTICES- In addition to any other requirements under the Help America Vote Act of 2002, the Election Assistance Commission shall study, test, and develop best practices to enhance accessibility and voter-verification mechanisms for disabled voters.
SEC. 5. CHANGE IN DEADLINE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS.
(a) IN GENERAL- Section 301(d) of the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (42 U.S.C. 15481(d)) is amended by striking `on and after January 1, 2006' and inserting `in time for elections for Federal office beginning with the regularly scheduled general election to be held in November 2004'.
(b) INTERIM PAPER SYSTEM- Each State and jurisdiction that certifies in the manner described in section 102(a)(3)(B) that it shall be unable to comply with the requirements of section 301 in time for the regularly scheduled general election for Federal office to be held in November 2004 shall receive a paper voting system, based on paper systems in use in the jurisdiction, if any, at the expense of the Commission that shall be deemed compliant with section 301 by the Commission for use in the November 2004 general elections.
SEC. 6. REQUIREMENT FOR FEDERAL CERTIFICATION OF TECHNOLOGICAL SECURITY OF VOTER REGISTRATION LISTS.
Section 303(a)(3) of the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (42 U.S.C. 15483(a)(3)) is amended by striking the period at the end and inserting the following: `, as certified by the Commission.'.
SEC. 7. REQUIREMENT FOR MANDATORY RECOUNTS.
The Election Assistance Commission shall conduct manual mandatory surprise recounts of the voter-verified records of each election for Federal office (and, at the option of the State or jurisdiction involved, of elections for State and local office) in .5 percent of the jurisdictions in each State and .5 percent of the overseas jurisdictions in which voter-verified records are preserved in accordance with this section immediately following each general election for Federal office, and shall promptly publish the results of those recounts. The treatment of the results of the recount shall be governed by applicable Federal, State, or local law, except that any individual who is a citizen of the jurisdiction involved may file an appeal with the Commission if the individual believes that such law does not provide a fair remedy.
SEC. 8. EFFECTIVE DATE.
Except as provided in section 3(b), the amendments made by this Act shall take effect as if included in the enactment of the Help America Vote Act of 2002.
Here is Section 205 of the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (42 U.S.C. 15325), which would be amended in H.R. 2239 by striking subsection (e):
SEC. 205. POWERS.(a) HEARINGS AND SESSIONS.—The Commission may hold such
hearings for the purpose of carrying out this Act, sit and act
at such times and places, take such testimony, and receive such
evidence as the Commission considers advisable to carry out this
Act. The Commission may administer oaths and affirmations to
witnesses appearing before the Commission.
(b) INFORMATION FROM FEDERAL AGENCIES.—The Commission
may secure directly from any Federal department or agency such
information as the Commission considers necessary to carry out
this Act. Upon request of the Commission, the head of such depart-ment
or agency shall furnish such information to the Commission.
(c) POSTAL SERVICES.—The Commission may use the United
States mails in the same manner and under the same conditions
as other departments and agencies of the Federal Government.
(d) ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES.—Upon the request of
the Commission, the Administrator of General Services shall pro-vide
to the Commission, on a reimbursable basis, the administrative
support services that are necessary to enable the Commission to
carry out its duties under this Act.
(e) CONTRACTS.—The Commission may contract with and com-pensate
persons and Federal agencies for supplies and services
without regard to section 3709 of the Revised Statutes of the United
States (41 U.S.C. 5).42 USC 15325.
Since the above paragraph does not bother to explain what section 3709 means, here is the section referenced, which H.R. 2239 puts back in effect:
Sec. 5. - Advertisements for proposals for purchases and contracts for supplies or services for Government departments; application to Government sales and contracts to sell and to Government corporations
Unless otherwise provided in the appropriation concerned or other law, purchases and contracts for supplies or services for the Government may be made or entered into only after advertising a sufficient time previously for proposals, except(1)
when the amount involved in any one case does not exceed $25,000,
(2)
when the public exigencies require the immediate delivery of the articles or performance of the service,
(3)
when only one source of supply is available and the Government purchasing or contracting officer shall so certify, or
(4)
when the services are required to be performed by the contractor in person and are
(A)
of a technical and professional nature or
(B)
under Government supervision and paid for on a time basis. Except
(1)
as authorized by section 1638
(2)
when otherwise authorized by law, or
(3)
when the reasonable value involved in any one case does not exceed $500, sales and contracts of sale by the Government shall be governed by the requirements of this section for advertising.
In the case of wholly owned Government corporations, this section shall apply to their administrative transactions only
In other words, we need H.R. 2239, or we can kiss the next election goodbye. Some might claim speed makes this impossible, but we still have 17 months. If they bought the computers now, they would be relics by November 2004! "Moore's Law" clearly states that processor speeds double every 18 months or so, and he's been proven right over and over again.